SEC vs. Ripple: End in Sight as Parties Argue Over Remedies
More legal tussling as the blockchain company claims that the so-called Fox Declaration should have been classified as expert testimony, not "standard summary evidence," as the SEC claims.
More legal tussling as the blockchain company claims that the so-called Fox Declaration should have been classified as expert testimony, not "standard summary evidence," as the SEC claims.
Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continue their legal battle, now focusing on the validity of certain materials and testimonies as the trial enters its critical phase.
In late March, the SEC argued for an injunction and nearly $2 billion in penalties, submitting new testimony from Andrea Fox, an SEC Enforcement Division Accountant.
A few weeks later, Ripple opposed the SEC's request with a motion to strike the "Fox Declaration" due to "sandbagging." In legal terms, this refers to a party withholding important information until the last minute, putting the other side at a disadvantage. Ripple claimed that the SEC failed to provide Fox's identity and testimony during the remedies-only discovery phase, hindering the blockchain firm's ability to respond properly.
The SEC countered Ripple’s objections on Monday, April 29, describing the testimony as "standard summary evidence in support of calculations for disgorgement." The regulator said this type of evidence is routine and appropriate for calculating financial remedies in legal proceedings.
"The SEC submitted the Fox Declaration to aid the Court by presenting essentially three calculations [...] With one minor exception, the Fox Declaration summarizes only documents produced or served by Ripple, including Ripple’s audited financial statements, interrogatory answers, and certain sales records."
The agency also cited a previous ruling in which Judge Analisa Torres dismissed similar objections from Ripple about testimonial classifications.
Ripple's reply brief, filed last Thursday, challenges these claims. Ripple maintains that Fox's testimony involves complex accounting assessments and should be classified as expert testimony, not merely as a summary. This distinction is crucial because it would suggest that the SEC failed to provide an expert report during the discovery phase.
According to Ripple, Fox's work, which involves major analysis and conclusions beyond simple calculations, "qualifies her unequivocally" as an expert under Federal Rule of Evidence 702(a). Ripple also took a swipe at the SEC’s timing and transparency in disclosing Fox as a witness, claiming procedural discrepancies that could prejudice the court.
In addition, Ripple noted that the SEC did not address a key argument in its last motion concerning cases in which judges dismissed entire testimonies for improper disclosure.
The court is expected to rule on Ripple's dismissal motion imminently. According to a tweet by pro-XRP lawyer James K. Filan, the SEC submitted its reply brief under seal on May 6, specifically addressing the remedies it seeks. This document, which is not yet public, is expected to directly challenge Ripple's motion to the SEC's earlier request for a punitive penalty and an injunction against the sale of XRP to institutional investors. The regulator will provide a public redacted version of the reply brief and supporting documents as soon as today. Parties are expected to file omnibus letter motions to "seal all materials relating to the remedies-related briefing" by May 13 and opposition letters by May 20.
Another Pro-XRP lawyer, Jeremy Hogan, said on X that he expects the SEC to win the motion. Other Ripple supporters shared a similar sentiment and said the court would allow Fox to testify and Ripple to depose her. Some expect the judge to appease the regulator by fining Ripple: "I’m saying that the Judge will order 0 disgorgement but throws the SEC a bone and orders Ripple to pay a $100 million penalty," Hogan told CryptoLaw on April 23.
XRP prices dipped on May 1 before bumping back to above $0.51 the next day in anticipation of Ripple's reply brief, according to Coingecko. The token has been on a downward trend since mid-April and seems to be getting more traction, as industry experts expect the lawsuit to conclude over the next three months. XRP currently stands at around $5.2 at the time of reporting and even reached over $5.8 on May 5 in anticipation of the SEC's remedies reply brief.